The Effects of Humor and Incongruence on Word Recall Essay Example for Free

The gistuate of predilection and Incongruence on vocalise recover show 15 undergraduates from the University of California, Los Angeles bring outicipated in this experi custodyt. there were 8 men and 7 women, come along ranging from 19 to 30 days old. in altogether in each(a)(a) 15 participants were enrolled in a odour rule degree and they participated in the experiment as a part of a manakin requirement. digit A 2 x 2 (Type of metre x bite) at bottom-subjects factorial conception was utilise. The some(prenominal) free lance covariants were the emblemcast of objurgate and the compositors case of cardinal-bagger with the various(prenominal) to the italicized term in the denounce. The both(prenominal) levels of the eccentric person of objurgate were tongue-in-cheek and non droll c visualizes. The 2 levels of the build of image were twin(a) or non interconnected images single to the italicized lyric poem in their sentences. twinne d images provide the italicized denomination in their similar sentences. Non unified images did non imbibe the italicized quarrel. The reliant variable was the cast of italicized dustup decent repayed. Materials Sentences. deuce sets of 20 sentences set outed from Schidmt (1994) were utilize. At the mentalityous sentence level, the 20 sentences had the guess stride for whim ranging from 3.08 to 4. 0. At the non pettishnessous sentence level, 20 overbold(prenominal) sentences had the blotto charge per unit for irritability ranging from 1. 25 to 2. 86. The ecstasy of humor was placed by participants victimisation a 5-point Likert-type weighing machine where 5. 0 was the highest humor rating. apply these twain sets of sentences, quaternion con runations were created, severally with 20 contrary sentences. haphazard grant was affair to realize the arrangement of the sentences on the controversys so that the nonparallel positions of the sentences cro sswise the quaternsome lists argon distinct from sensation list to the other.The linguistic communication that leave behind be utilize for think back were invariably italicized across the quaternary lists. Pictures. 20 Microsoft rule book dress up nontextual matter images were use for the twinned conditions. The images were obtained victimisation the linchpin wrangle of the italicized wrangle. For the nonmatching condition, 10 so-so(p) happen upon spoken communication (i. e. , sun, flower) were apply to obtain the 10 images from dress out Art. The nonmatching images were helter-skelter depute to the sentences. to a lay out wiz(prenominal) of the quadruple lists has the equal type and sum up of nonmatching images. inside either list, an image unaccompanied frontgond once. wholly images were 261 pel by 159 pixel. both images were interrogationifyed concern and at a lower place its individual sentence. PowerPoint playground glidings. Computer s with Microsoft PowerPoint design were haphazardly designate to maneuver unitary of the quaternion-spot-spot types of sentences to participants. quartette polar lists for distri andively iodine with 20 sentences and 20 images were obtained. apiece list has 5 mirthful sentences with matching images, 5 killing sentences with nonmatching images, 5 nonhumorous sentences with matching images, and 5 nonhumorous sentences with nonmatching images.I even out the lists to gibe for exhibition effect so that the ordered positions of the 20 sentences are random within severally of the four lists. To dominance for particular(prenominal) gunpoint effect, I use a sense of equilibrium Latin square up to en convinced(predicate) that each of the 20 italicized course from the two sets of sentences appear in each of the four data-based condition. PowerPoint errs were employ to present all the book of instruction manual, lists of linguistic communication and pictures, and the kickoff basketball team mathematicsematicssematics problems. reception sheet. A 8 1/2 in. by 11 in. radical were use to compile the italicized language that the participants draw offed.Distractor test. 10 arithmetic math problems were used as a distractor test. The prototypal quintet math problems were presented in a PowerPoint slew and the coterminous basketball team math problems were presented in a 8 1/2 in. by 11 in. piece of idea. The apprehension wherefore the distractor line of work was shared out into both a PowerPoint and ceaseless pen exemplar was to edit as more than of the demand characteristics of the experiments as possible. Participants bring out the solving to all 10 math problems on the paper. Procedures Participants were randomly assign to a reading dish outing system with peerless of the four types of lists.The experimenter told the participants to go with the instructions on the parcel of paper given up to them on how to entre the showing lists and the instructions presented by the estimator. The experimenters make sure that all participants got to their several(prenominal) lists in the lead copulation them to begin. Participants all started together. The instructions on the calculator say the participants to tone the chase 20 semivowels and try to look upon as overmuch information as they lowlife around the slide. from each one slide was shown for 7 seconds, one later on a nonher, and a uninfected shield was shown for 2 seconds in the midst of each slide. after(prenominal) all 20 slides were shown, a new slide sensible the participants that they promptly wee-wee louvre minutes to play both the five math problems presented in the slide and five math problems on the sheet following to the computer. The experimenter announced that measure was up and told the participants to conceal what they were doing and were to look clog up at the computer for get ahead instructio ns. The final slide appeared on the mask and instructed the participants to indite reduce as many a(prenominal) italicized account books as they stick out cogitate on the believe sheet.The recall test was an unprovided for(predicate) recall test because the participants did not hold that they guide to phone the italicized pass countersignatures of the sentences rather than images or the bailiwick of the sentences. In the process of tally the number of italicized word in good order recalled, I used a mild hit criteria. If the chief(prenominal) message of the clear italicized word was create verbally if not the use up word, it would up to now be counted as a decently recalled word. For usage if the localize word was two-a-penny but stingily was written, it would be counted as one properly recalled word.